View Single Post
Old 05-17-2013, 12:25 PM   #6
pwpanas
Supra Owner
 
pwpanas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
pwpanas is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SupraHead View Post
6 speed TT manual below 100k 93-94 or 98
What's wrong with a '95, or '97? There's almost no difference at all between a '94 and a '95, for example. In '96 the only issue I know is that it didn't come in a 6spd due to the OBDII emissions standards. In '97 the only issue I'm aware of is with an auto transmission, the oem diff was not an LSD (i.e. the same diff that's in the '97 auto n/a). The '97s and '98s are nearly identical (just like the '94s and '95s are the same...except for the '97 auto TT non-LSD diff, of course), as far as I know.

Other than '97, there's nothing wrong with the auto...especially if you want to drag race. In the 1/4 mile from a dead stop, an auto TT is quicker and more consistent than a 6spd...both bone stock and bpu.

Again, why not a '95 auto, a '95 6spd, or a '97 6spd? If you don't want to worry about OBDII, to me '95 was the best year for the Mkiv TT in the US.
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+
Displacement is no replacement for boost.
Life begins at 30psi.


NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners.

Last edited by pwpanas; 05-19-2013 at 02:57 PM.
pwpanas is offline   Reply With Quote