damn 240sx

SupraMan1784 · 12-07-2005, 02:45 PM

hes an 86.5 so im assuming hes na like all the ones that came that year.. i think, but i worked on 240's before, sr's ka's and an rb, ka's arent rev happy you might need a couple mods to open up the flow before it can really get going, but they do have a lot of torque in stock form, sr's on teh otherhand are nice motors with a lot of potential and a good powerband, and rb's...are just on another level like the 2jz...nothing pretty much compares, but i am assuming the 240 had light mods in that car, otherwise you would have been able to keep close to it

12-07-2005, 02:45 PM	#6
SupraMan1784 SP58GT Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Dirty Jerz Posts: 691	hes an 86.5 so im assuming hes na like all the ones that came that year.. i think, but i worked on 240's before, sr's ka's and an rb, ka's arent rev happy you might need a couple mods to open up the flow before it can really get going, but they do have a lot of torque in stock form, sr's on teh otherhand are nice motors with a lot of potential and a good powerband, and rb's...are just on another level like the 2jz...nothing pretty much compares, but i am assuming the 240 had light mods in that car, otherwise you would have been able to keep close to it __________________ Now: Saving for an MKIV Broken Rides: (Sold) 91 supra turbo 5speed with a 1jzgte motor 421whp 400(399) ft*lbs of torque on tap @ 15 psi "Always outnumbered, never outgunned."