1994 toyota supra vs. 1993 mazda rx7

Poodles · 08-04-2005, 05:50 AM

All I can say is that I got beaten by a late model RX-7 and he didn't walk on me that hard, doubt they could beat a Mk4 stock for stock. Keep in mind that the RX7 is smaller, and is only a 2 seater, supra's seat 4

LOL, what is wrong with you, Celica's can be very fast, but the US version suck. JDM Celica turbo all-wheel-drive model is actually quite fast. Certainly faster than these honda's and acura's running around thinking they're fast...

This whole thread looks like a troll trying to start crap IMHO, but to put the nail in the coffin, RX-7 are good...too bad the engines are throw away units that have to be replaced ever 100k miles or so. May be fast, but Supra is far more durable...

08-04-2005, 05:50 AM	#7
Poodles 12psi boost Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 348	All I can say is that I got beaten by a late model RX-7 and he didn't walk on me that hard, doubt they could beat a Mk4 stock for stock. Keep in mind that the RX7 is smaller, and is only a 2 seater, supra's seat 4 LOL, what is wrong with you, Celica's can be very fast, but the US version suck. JDM Celica turbo all-wheel-drive model is actually quite fast. Certainly faster than these honda's and acura's running around thinking they're fast... This whole thread looks like a troll trying to start crap IMHO, but to put the nail in the coffin, RX-7 are good...too bad the engines are throw away units that have to be replaced ever 100k miles or so. May be fast, but Supra is far more durable...