Supra vs Celica

CanadianBak'inSupra · 10-31-2010, 03:43 PM

ive had 3 celica supras and 3 mk3 supras.
stock for stock the mk3 is faster top speed, but i find that the celica is lighter and gets up a little faster.
seems that the shorter stroke, helps it get to the higher rmps faster.

but after i build 1 of the 4 5ms in my garage i would look out...
im just still lookin for a turbo.

and to be honest i think the celica looks nicer.

all the 240s and other nissans looks so similair.
i guess old corollas look kinda the same.

and mostly i see little punks who dont know shit about there mk3s driving around. it bothers me...

but thats just my train of thought.

10-31-2010, 03:43 PM	#22
CanadianBak'inSupra Official hall monitor / search nazi - NO SOUP FOR YOU! Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Canada, BC Posts: 837	ive had 3 celica supras and 3 mk3 supras. stock for stock the mk3 is faster top speed, but i find that the celica is lighter and gets up a little faster. seems that the shorter stroke, helps it get to the higher rmps faster. but after i build 1 of the 4 5ms in my garage i would look out... im just still lookin for a turbo. and to be honest i think the celica looks nicer. all the 240s and other nissans looks so similair. i guess old corollas look kinda the same. and mostly i see little punks who dont know shit about there mk3s driving around. it bothers me... but thats just my train of thought. __________________ 1984 supra - 1uzfe - w58 - 4.10 - 1 piece aluminum shaft.