08-11-2008, 12:31 PM | #11 | |
walbro fp
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA - Harford County, Maryland
Posts: 481
|
Quote:
I admire the style of a CRX, if I chose to put money into a Honda I would chose the CRX. |
|
08-12-2008, 08:11 PM | #12 |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brentwood, New York
Posts: 162
|
I had an 89 CRX SI with the B16A Swap. The car was quick (Keyword being quick), but that was $3000 plus the cost of the car. Then I would have to dump another $3000-$4000 to make it faster with a turbo kit (Custom). At that, the car was now fast, but any factory stock turbocharged car that had an intercooler and boost upgrade either wiped me or I gave it a good run. Now I have a 91 Supra Turbo that has about $1500 worth of work and it's way faster than my crx was. Especially up top. The CRX was a killer off the line, but had nothing after 110. The supra is a beast around those speeds. By the way, you wanna buy mine?
__________________
'91 Turbo Targa 5 Spd. '87 Corolla GT-S 5 Spd '91 Accord Daily Driver 5 Spd Soon to be rebuilt (All to some extent) |
08-12-2008, 08:33 PM | #13 |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 203
|
If your seriously asking whether you should buy a Supra or a CRX....just get the CRX.
__________________
my car: 1987 brownish Toyota Supra Turbo, automatic 7MGTE engine with ~100k miles on it. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help Me Decide!!! | SICKY_SUPRA | Drifting | 2 | 02-07-2007 09:18 PM |
Supra V-8 conversion | zmzmzm | MKIII Supra | 55 | 06-23-2006 01:11 PM |