03-26-2007, 12:06 AM | #1 |
Stock
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan/Australia
Posts: 7
|
Looking to buy supra
hey guys, i'm new to this forum. thought it'd be a good idea to find out some stuff before i buy my car.
i'm looking to buy a Supra MKIV, maybe 1995 model. My problem is, would it be better to buy the RZ and change the turbos, or to buy a SZ and put in turbos. other than the obvious power difference between the two, and the fact that the RZ is a 6-speed, i'm not really sure if there are any other differences that would matter. any advice would be great. also, i'm lookin at spending maybe $20k on mods after i've bought the car. any tips on what mods would optimize my car's performance and handling? (i dont want the car to be any more powerful than 500HP). thanks P.S. i'm quite new to cars and modifications, so go easy on all the tech terms Last edited by chuan01; 03-26-2007 at 12:13 AM. Reason: forgot something |
04-04-2007, 03:25 AM | #2 | |
SP58GT
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Dirty Jerz
Posts: 691
|
Quote:
__________________
Now: Saving for an MKIV Broken Rides: (Sold) 91 supra turbo 5speed with a 1jzgte motor 421whp 400(399) ft*lbs of torque on tap @ 15 psi "Always outnumbered, never outgunned." |
|
04-04-2007, 04:03 AM | #3 |
Stock
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan/Australia
Posts: 7
|
thanks a lot ok, well my current budget is enough to cover both the SZ and the RZ. the only thing i'm thinking, is that insurance on the RZ is gonna be pretty steep. but if what you say about it being more costly to do the mods, and the fact that i can achieve 500hp without changing the turbos....then maybe the RZ is the way to go.
one question though, the stock turbos can handle the 500hp right? |
04-04-2007, 04:16 PM | #4 |
SP58GT
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Dirty Jerz
Posts: 691
|
yea, ive known a couple of people that have run 500hp on the stock twins...i think around 550hp is when you have to upgrade the whole turbo system, the stock motor itself can handle the power, but it gains a lot through simple bolt ons as well
__________________
Now: Saving for an MKIV Broken Rides: (Sold) 91 supra turbo 5speed with a 1jzgte motor 421whp 400(399) ft*lbs of torque on tap @ 15 psi "Always outnumbered, never outgunned." |
04-04-2007, 11:17 PM | #5 |
Stock
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan/Australia
Posts: 7
|
just one more question...sorry i seem to keep thinking of questions after i've made a post
roughly how much more does it cost to do the modifications to a non-turbo? because i find that the cost of a non-turbo 2JZ is a lot cheaper than the turboed 2JZ. what's required to put turbos on a non-turbo? new pipes? and IF i have made the modifications, will the 5-speed gearbox make much difference compared to the RZ's 6-speed? and another thing, i want to put a decent sound system in the car, but having looked at the boot space, i'm not exactly sure how i can fit a sub and amp in. any ideas? thanks heaps for your replies |
04-05-2007, 01:42 PM | #6 | ||||||
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In general, if you're sure that you want 500rwhp+, you'll need to consider a single turbo and an upgraded fuel system. Quote:
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. Last edited by pwpanas; 04-05-2007 at 02:49 PM. |
||||||
04-05-2007, 01:48 PM | #7 | ||||||
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
Actually, the oem coilovers are excellent. The oem suspension actually roadraces just fine, and has done VERY well in circuits such as OLOA. 'Keepin' it real' here, most guys put coilovers or springs on their Supras because they think it looks 'cool' to have the car lowered. If you want to look cool, then that's fine. If you want the car to perform, the un-lowered mkiv tt oem suspension can outperform a lowered mkiv tt in many roadrace driving conditions. Of course, the oem suspension will handle most street driving situations (eg potholes & speed bumps) much better too. If, after aggressively roadracing your Mkiv Supra TT on a real roadrace track, you find the suspension a bit mushy, all you need to do is replace the shocks (not the springs) with a set of KYB/AGXs. Again, I'd recommend you drive the oem suspension first, before you decide to make that change, because (again) the oem jza80 tt suspension is actually a great setup. If you are extremely serious about competing at roadracing, then of course a full set of integrated, adjustable coilovers and sway bars can be beneficial. Also note that this type of extreme suspension upgrade can make your Supra MUCH less friendly for street driving. In short, if you want your girlfriend's fillings to fall out of her teeth on the way to the movie theater, then go ahead and install a full set of race coilovers the same day you purchase your Supra. General Tip: Lastly, be sure to set aside a good chunk of that $20K you mentioned for upgrades...in order to do full, proper maintenance on the car. Who knows what might be wrong with it if you purchase it used, especially if it has higher mileage. It might need a full 60K maintenance, including a new timing belt. It might need new coilpacks or a new harmonic dampener. Hell, a full set of good z-rated tires can run over $1K usd. This car is much more like a Porsche/Z06/Ferrari/Viper to maintain properly (i.e. don't budget your maintenance $ for the car like it's a Camry/Corolla/Celica/etc.) Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.boostlogic.com/parts/supr...oKitStage2.htm Quote:
Quote:
http://www.wickedcas.com/gallery/mai...gicboxes/mkiv/
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. Last edited by pwpanas; 04-05-2007 at 03:01 PM. |
||||||
04-05-2007, 11:21 PM | #8 |
Stock
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan/Australia
Posts: 7
|
hey guys, thanks heaps for the posts. heaps of help
originally lookin at 500hp at the wheels. but i guess i'll see how well i can handle the car first before i increase power =P but i definitely do not want anything more, otherwise i mite kill myself lol and thanks for the info on differences between the RZ and SZ. i tried looking online for specs, but didn't find anything of any use. looks like the decisions been made then. RZ it is!! w00t |
04-06-2007, 01:23 AM | #9 | ||||
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.toyota-supra.info/forums/...ead.php?t=6947 Either way, I'm glad the info was helpful.
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
||||
04-06-2007, 01:38 AM | #10 | |
Stock
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan/Australia
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
i noticed on a lot of online videos, that supra's tend to be slower than skylines off a standing start (because of the skyline's AWD) despite having more power. is there any way that's relatively low-cost to better the supra's grip and initial acceleration? i noticed you have a '94 supra. how much power does yours run? some of my friends have been egging me to get a skyline instead, but i prefer the look of the supra. any info on advantages supra has over skylines? (sorry if these posts are troublesome...i'm still pretty new to cars and modifications) |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Begginer to SUPRA and cars, I GOT A FREE SUPRA, PLEASE HELP!! | 89MkiiiSupra | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 5 | 06-01-2010 06:48 AM |
Kill Board! | Isphius | Show n Tell | 95 | 01-25-2010 05:05 AM |
Questions about MKIV Supra | ukno0003 | MKIV Supra | 5 | 11-06-2008 10:53 AM |
Dream Offer | Karma_Supra | MKIV Supra | 22 | 10-17-2007 03:04 PM |
new here and thinking about getting a Supra | WhisPer | MKIV FAQ | 20 | 03-17-2007 01:35 PM |