03-26-2008, 02:45 AM | #1 |
Stock
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 29
|
possible power output for tuning a non-turbo supra
this is, without installing a turbo. i can't do that because i legally can't drive turbo cars, until im off my p's at age 20. 18 now, but looking at a non-turbo model. also i can't exceed 200kw's (280hp). i know they are stock about 160, what would get me to 190's? and also, when i'm 20, could i add a turbo and get about 400 / 450hp (300 - 350kw) without buying a new car, and would it be safe, as i know non turbo engines are different from turbo engines? thanx
|
03-26-2008, 01:12 PM | #2 |
Stock
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Africa
Posts: 23
|
you could change your cams. larger injectors. different ecu. decat. 2-2-4 branch. could get your power up to close to 200hp.. it depends on how much you are willing to spend
|
03-27-2008, 01:39 AM | #3 |
Stock
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 29
|
close to 200hp? they have OVER 200hp stock. or do you mean 200extra horsepower? im confused. anyway they have about 160kw stock, which is about 220hp, so that woud reduce power? and i can't go turbo until i turn 20, which is a shame. i haver the money required for a MKIV supra, and a few grand for extra's, but i just can't go turbo, or exceed 200kw (about 250hp)
and would it really be necessary to upgrade the cams? don't they last until about 500hp anyway? and the ecu. do you know anything about the cost of that? couple of grand, right? |
03-27-2008, 06:48 AM | #4 | |
Stock
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Africa
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
oops. sorry. close to 200kw. better? fitting a bigger cam means there is more time for air to get into the combustion chamber. more air=more power. just to see if i have the once sentence right.. only upgrade a ecu when your close to 500hp?? you can change the ecu on a stock car. they can map it in the way you want. performance or fuel consumption. your building a n/a car. so you need to get power from any place you can. n/a cars are more expensive to get to the same power as turbo cars. but they say in the end when you do get there.. it was all worth it.. but i dont know about that. im a turbo person. with a little hint of nos |
|
03-27-2008, 11:33 AM | #5 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. Last edited by pwpanas; 03-27-2008 at 11:42 AM. |
|
03-27-2008, 12:09 PM | #6 |
Stock
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Africa
Posts: 23
|
to make more power.. yes. different components in the engine do different things. you can have as much power as you want. but if you cant get any air into the engine. what does all the power help you.. changing the cams will help get the air better into the car. see where im going with this?
|
03-28-2008, 04:28 AM | #7 |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
I have no idea about the 2jz-ge (non-turbo). The us-spec 2jz-gte can make over 700rwhp with the oem cams.
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
03-28-2008, 03:37 PM | #8 |
Stock
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Africa
Posts: 23
|
how big is the oem cams? 268?
|
03-29-2008, 01:41 AM | #9 |
Stock
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 19
|
hey man just do the smart thing. dont waste money on a n/a. wait 2 years, itll just fly by. your just young and excited. buy and mkiv or get a turbo engine. then you got a nice power plant under the hood
|
03-29-2008, 04:21 AM | #10 |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
They're closer to 248s (perhaps even as small as 242s), which is still plenty large enough when you're dealing with forced induction and very high cylinder pressures (compared with an n/a engine).
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
what do you think of this setup? | Jareduhhhh | MKIV Supra | 4 | 02-19-2009 10:38 AM |
1000hp here i come | disturbednitehawk | Shops & Part Reviews | 36 | 07-28-2006 02:30 AM |
Power FC for Jap spec 1999 Supra Turbo? | JZA80-1999 | Shops & Part Reviews | 0 | 01-03-2006 05:33 PM |