01-09-2010, 08:12 PM | #1 |
Stock
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: PDX
Posts: 2
|
looking at a mk4...What to offer?
I looked at a mk4 today,Its a black all stock minus wheels and intake 95 n/a auto with 225k miles on it with a clean carfax never been titled outside of cali. The car looks great for the mileage and drives good but im not sure what to offer the guy for the price. KBB is 10.5k but i know theses cars usually go for more?
it also comes with a wrecked,totaled 94 mk4 6spdTT with complete 80k drivetrain minus the diff. and lots of extra parts on it(tt calipers,carbon clutch tein coilovers,6spd pedals,misc parts |
01-10-2010, 12:08 AM | #2 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
Oh, and note that this forum is under "Performance and General Modification Forums - for generation specific discussions". Pricing discussions aren't the primary purpose of this forum, but again if another member has some input for you on this topic I don't mind at all if this discussion goes on. If you end up wanting to sell the parts from that extra wrecked Supra, please post that ad in the appropriate for-sale forum.
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. Last edited by pwpanas; 01-10-2010 at 12:11 AM. |
|
01-12-2010, 11:33 PM | #3 |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Garden Grove, CA
Posts: 106
|
I have an 89 Turbo and have been thinking about getting an MKIV. Any specifics you can point me to to look out for? Haven't decided on the N/A versus Turbo, yet. For example......I know the MKIII is known for blown, head gasket, oil leaks, etc. etc.....anything the MKIV is notorious for?
|
01-13-2010, 02:34 AM | #4 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
If you find a well maintained Mkiv TT that either hasn't been modified, or has been modified properly and has always run race fuel, it's a keeper. There are easy fixes we can help you find for any of the minor items that owners have found over the years (eg. the hatch rattle in the pre-'97 models). Get the car and send us your questions. Oh and don't get an n/a. It's nothing at all like the TT except in the 'looks' department.
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. Last edited by pwpanas; 01-13-2010 at 02:39 AM. |
|
01-14-2010, 07:20 PM | #5 |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Garden Grove, CA
Posts: 106
|
Thanks for the info. I actually do have a couple more questions if that's o.k. As stated I have an MKIII and the only thing I really did was put a 3" exhaust on it and rims from a n/a MKIV.....really wanted the turbo rims, but I couldnt' pass up that deal. Anyway, I recently test drove a n/a MKIV and really didn't like the visibility and the low seating, but it's something I can overlook. I did however like the handling.....felt a bit more stiff than my MKIII, but not too overbearing. I know there's a huge difference in the MKIV turbo and am waiting for something local to test drive and possibly buy......but like you said, many seem to be modified....and I would venture to say....half-a$$. I just want to drive something stock, but that seems hard to come by. Here's my questions. Is the MKIII turbo faster than the MKIV n/a? Specs seems to say it is, but when I drove it, I really couldn't tell. Can I run 87 octane on the n/a MKIV? Thanks in advance for your comments or anyone else who would like to chime in. BTW I really like the look of the MKIV, that's why I'm thinking about getting one, but do I want to get rid of my MKIII that only has about 83,000 miles?
|
01-14-2010, 11:37 PM | #6 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
Honestly I wouldn't. One of the reasons it's so hard to get an n/a Mkiv to perform anywhere close to a TT is due the the higher compression ratio pistons in the 2jz-ge.Keep the MKIII for your daily driver and get the MKIV TT to modify - or mod the MKIII and daily-drive the MKIV. Either way you've got a winning combo! (Can you tell I'm a Supra nut? )
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
|
01-15-2010, 07:23 PM | #7 |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Garden Grove, CA
Posts: 106
|
Once again thanks for the info. I'd love to keep them all but I have too many toys. I actually have two 7mgte, but one has a broken driver's side key hole due to someone breaking into it. It's just sitting there till I have time to fix it or sell it as is. I also have a blown Tacoma S-Runner that's putting down about 242 to the wheels. It's my sleeper truck. I'm not out to break any records or anything, just like to do a little modding....but like you said....do it correctly.....and that usually means, it's not cheap. I'd like to pick up a stock MKIV turbo....but am not in a hurry.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MK3 supra... is this worth making an offer ?? | turbothrusters | MKIII Supra | 8 | 05-19-2008 05:46 AM |
1990 Supra Turbo...What would you offer? | Dinner | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 11 | 04-21-2007 05:17 PM |
whats a good offer on a 90 turbo? | j3pz | MKIII Supra | 2 | 04-25-2006 04:29 AM |