02-21-2010, 08:57 PM | #1 |
Stock
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 5
|
single or twin?
hi, just a general wonder... i know single turbo is better for top end performance and speed, but is a single or twin better as 'a turbo' cos i take it both have pro's and cons yet which is 'the better turbo' for a supra? i like how singles sound more, but which (both on a car with 800hp) would be 'better'?
thanks nath |
02-24-2010, 03:39 AM | #2 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
The aftermarket single has two primary advantages over aftermarket (parallel) twins: 1) Cost. and 2) Reliability. You might find these additional clarifications useful:
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. Last edited by pwpanas; 02-28-2010 at 08:57 AM. |
|
02-24-2010, 09:53 PM | #3 |
Stock
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 5
|
oh, theres a vicious common beleif, you hear it on youtube for example a huge amount, turns you they're wrong then
whats the difference in cost between the single and twin (parallel)? and how much more reliable? thats weird because i knew it would be more reliable.. just makes sense.. one turbo over two XD and i know singles are aftermarket only, and only twins are available stock or aftermarket, but was just a general wonder and finding out jobbie. thanks for the info nath |
02-24-2010, 10:41 PM | #4 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
My *guess* is about twice as reliable. For example, let's say aftermarket twins are 99% reliable over any three year period. A single would probably be about 99.5% reliable over that period of time (0.5% failure rate for a single vs. 1.0% failure rate for twins).
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. Last edited by pwpanas; 02-26-2010 at 01:39 PM. |
|
02-26-2010, 10:39 PM | #5 |
Stock
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 5
|
! jesus lmao you know your stuff! and thanks, for the info so essentially overall single is ever so slightly better as an all rounder?
thanks nath |
02-27-2010, 02:00 PM | #6 |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
I wouldn't say slightly. Half the price ($5k USD vs $10k USD for the kit) makes a single a lot better than "slightly" imho...
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
02-28-2010, 12:59 AM | #7 |
Stock
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 5
|
haha! well there is always that side of things, half the price does make a difference to how on the paper lasts! XD thanks again for the info, much appreciated
nath Last edited by pwpanas; 02-28-2010 at 08:56 AM. |
Tags |
single turbo, supra, twin turbo |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1987 Twin Turbo | 87TT | MKIII Supra | 18 | 10-22-2009 09:22 AM |
twin turbo conver to single | nightreaper | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 1 | 02-14-2007 10:12 AM |
Did they make an original single turbo supra (1994)? | ts1994 | MKIV Supra | 3 | 07-20-2006 08:18 PM |
Looking for a turbo Supra twin or single | gasgas | MKIV Supra | 0 | 04-18-2005 10:46 PM |