|
|
10-24-2010, 11:01 PM
|
#1 |
|
Stock
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 27
 |
I decided I'll just go with 500 approx rwhp, give or take fifteen but 500 would be nice... Then if I want to go bigger later I can. Is this possible with bpu++++? And still reliable.
Nevermind you clearly said 450 was possible with good compression bit not 500. If I was to go with 500 still would it involve turbo upgrade? Last edited by pwpanas; 10-24-2010 at 11:29 PM. |
|
|
|
10-24-2010, 11:31 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
If you want to go with the goal of 450rwhp+ and bpu++++, that is only achievable with a just-like-brand-new engine, just-like-brand-new turbos, and a 6spd. Are you willing to swap out these oem parts, depending on their mileage/hours/condition? If not, 425rwhp (with a 6spd) is probably the max you can shoot for - and even that level depends heavily on those same components already being in very good condition (but brand-new condition isn't necessary for 425rwhp). If your compression numbers are low, or your oem turbos have a lot of miles/hours on them (or they've been driven very hard), and you've got an auto transmission, 375rwhp or so may be the best your setup can achieve. Again, it's all a matter of $, time and experitise. Again, are you 6spd or auto? Again, what is your application?
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. Last edited by pwpanas; 10-24-2010 at 11:40 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2010, 01:05 AM
|
#3 |
|
Stock
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 27
|
6 speed manual trans, I don't think I would want a single turbo would it be possible to stay twin and reach 500whp? I just driving the car as a summer car and take it to the strip sometimes to race other people, it's like a Friday night thing at a local drag strip.
if I was to go with the 425-450 rwhp how much would it cost for the new turbo's, etc. that I would need to be brand new again? okay I made my decision, i'm gonna go bpu++++, we will get whatever whp out of it we can without turbo upgrade, if i want i can do that and change everything later but as a daily driver 400whp approx, should do.. thanks for the help and if you could let me know what I'd need, that would be much appreciated, thanks. Last edited by pwpanas; 10-25-2010 at 04:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
10-25-2010, 04:49 PM
|
#4 | |||
|
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I've never bpu'd a Japanese-spec Mkiv myself. I believe you'll also need a speed limiter defensor. We may also need to find a way to get your downpipe connection made larger so you can run a full 3" US-spec downpipe.
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. Last edited by pwpanas; 10-25-2010 at 04:53 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
10-25-2010, 05:01 PM
|
#5 |
|
Stock
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 27
|
So would it be cheaper to just go bpu++++ and make what I can, like 400whp or 425 or whatever I'll get or single turbo and make 500whp?
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2010, 11:27 PM
|
#6 | |
|
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2010, 11:43 PM
|
#7 |
|
Stock
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 27
|
How much more expensive would a single turbo upgrade be? And if I chose to go bpu++++ this year how much money would I waste going single next year?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Performance Cap and Rotor? | btwilson86 | MKIII Supra | 9 | 08-02-2010 03:11 PM |
| Changes to a N/A Supra to increase performance | Sup93a | MKIV Supra | 9 | 02-02-2010 03:14 AM |
| Max safe long straight performance in a road race? | Humba | MKIV Supra | 7 | 12-25-2008 05:38 AM |
| Edo Performance Party and Car show (SoCal) | promark | MKIV Supra | 0 | 05-27-2008 09:56 PM |
| Gtech Performance meter | landspeedxxx | MKIII Supra | 4 | 04-24-2006 05:45 PM |
Hybrid Mode
