|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
2) You don't need an AEM to run only 650rwhp. 3) If you're getting an AEM 100% for sure (for whatever reason), then get it installed and running perfectly with the oem twins first. Then put on the 100% complete fuel system and get that working with the AEM. After that put on the turbo kit. If you make all of the changes at once, among other things troubleshooting will be a nightmare. You can run 650rwhp just fine with the oem maf and a simple 'piggyback' fuel controller. If anything, there's too much on your list already, other than the need for wider rims and tires to handle the additional horsepower (unless you want to just sit there spinning instead of going fast). Oh, the oem clutch won't handle 650rwhp. Let me know if you have any questions about clutch upgrades.
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. Last edited by pwpanas; 05-04-2012 at 01:03 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: May 2011
Location: New Albany, Ohio
Posts: 53
![]() |
![]()
When I purchased the car, it already had new injectors installed.
I guess the reason I wanted that turbo was because of the quick spool valve. I already have the AEM Fuel Management System I didn't realize I didn't have to get a standalone for 650whp. I am currently running a Southbend Stage 3 clutch. So then if I want to do 650whp, should I go with a 67mm turbo then like in the kit you sent me? http://www.spracingonline.com/store/...93-98_Supra/28 With that kit I will have to also buy a full fuel system then? Can you send me a link to a good system along with anything else I might need? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||||
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Does it also have a second fuel pump and additional fuel line installed too? Quote:
Quote:
Okay, but what is the width of your rear rims? Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: May 2011
Location: New Albany, Ohio
Posts: 53
![]() |
![]()
As far as I know, it just has fuel injectors and a fuel rail upgrade. So should I just buy the fuel system kit from Sound Performance?
Ok so I will give them a call about a 67mm turbo kit that has the most up to date parts and I will probley just keep the fuel management then to avoid spending 2k more lol. I will have to get back to you on tire width I forget how wide I got but I know I got the widest I could fit. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: May 2011
Location: New Albany, Ohio
Posts: 53
![]() |
![]()
I will take a picture once I get home from the Kentucky Derby but if I don't have a second fuel pump, would I just have to install a second pump instead of buying a fuel system? What else I guess would I need to be able to run 650whp through 750cc injectors and fuel rail?
I will let you know as well what size tires and rims I have once I get home. But all together does the 67mm turbo kit from Sound Performace look like a good choice to go with then? If so, what a/r should I go with? .68 or .81? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
![]() |
![]() Quote:
To be conservative, I'd recommend the .81 a/r. It'll allow you to control boost spikes more consistently. Again, it's better to be safe than sorry - slightly slower spool-up is better than a blown engine.
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: May 2011
Location: New Albany, Ohio
Posts: 53
![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Although you can't easily calculate precisely how much boost you can run with a given octane of gasoline, you can get 'in the ballpark' ... after that, it's best to use data logging of your knock sensors to determine the real number. Also recall that octane degrades over time, so you can run more boost with fresh fuel than you can with fuel that's six months old. The real calculations use difficult-to-collect data points like cylinder pressure and the temperature of the metal in the spark plug. Please take a look at this post (above) for a set of approximate boost-to-octane ratios: http://www.toyota-supra.info/forums/102902-post29.html In that chart, you see that pump gas is only 88MON, which is only good for about 15psi. Of course, you'll get more power at 15psi with a 700rwhp turbo than you will with the stock twins. However, above 15psi you need to use the data from your knock sensors to ensure you're not damaging your engine. The only other alternative is to keep raising boost until you blow up an engine (or significantly reduce it's compression/leakdown numbers), and then next time (and $4000 later, including parts and labor) don't run that much boost. ![]()
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. Last edited by pwpanas; 06-02-2012 at 01:13 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: May 2011
Location: New Albany, Ohio
Posts: 53
![]() |
![]()
I have been hearing a lot about people putting heat blankets on their turbos, would you recommend doing something like this?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Was there ever just a single turbo supra every built. | MarkN10 | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 6 | 12-05-2011 02:46 AM |
HELP PLEASE | Nick0887 | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 4 | 02-28-2009 07:26 AM |
Did they make an original single turbo supra (1994)? | ts1994 | MKIV Supra | 3 | 07-20-2006 08:18 PM |
Sequential Turbo Question | suprapoweredsoarer | MKIV Supra | 1 | 06-06-2006 12:13 AM |
Turbo lag question. | rnoswal | MKIII Supra | 6 | 02-12-2006 05:42 AM |