11-21-2012, 12:23 AM | #1 |
Stock
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SCV, CA
Posts: 9
|
Backpressure to damage car?
Hi,
Been quite awhile since I've been here, and lo-and-behold, my login still works! Background: I've had my 1997 MKIV NA for awhile and (10 years), and now want to upgrade to a turbo (not engine swap to GTE). So, i'm doing as much reading and researching as i can to mitigate any risk(s) involved etc. I want the build/upgrade to be as "seamless" as possible. Sort of a plug in play. Having said that, I'd like to keep everything intact - my catalytic converter to be specific. i know i know, not very smart if i want to go turbo since exhaust needs to be expelled quicker, however, i really don't want to deal with the hassle of taking everything apart every other year (smog check), or dealing with getting pulled over and getting a ticket for a failed visual inspection etc. Question: Will the back pressure from keeping the cats in any way would harm the engine/turbo? I looked around on several sites during research and could not find a clear answer. The subject seems to go off in a tangent with people stating what they should and should not do instead of whether or not it would actually cause damage. maybe because it won't? figured there are a few experts here and would try my luck. Thanks in advance! |
11-21-2012, 12:09 PM | #2 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
|
11-21-2012, 01:12 PM | #3 | |
Stock
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SCV, CA
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
thank you for the reply. and yes, i was thinking that the stock (any vehicle) turbo made in california with the dual cats would have tons of back pressure, but my logic was that most people would upgrade to aftermarket turbos giving higher boost. in turn needing more exit bandwidth. which in turn of course would cause more damage... well, i don't know how the fk i even came to that conclusion in the first place. was researching turbos and some wiki said it worked more effectively with an open outflow. so instead of thinking logically, like "oh, it just won't be as effective", i got a little paranoid and was like, "crap!". in any case, that answers this one... and thank you much for that. ting
__________________
1997 Supra NA Hopefully soon to be NA-T |
|
11-21-2012, 11:56 PM | #4 |
Stock
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pontefrac
Posts: 24
|
Cat and turbs
Just a thought here, now I don't pretend to know about back pressure or Californian smog rules, but just a bit of logical thinking here, if a Lambo can have multiple turbs or a Ferrari same sort of set up then what should be the problem of getting a better flowing cat? You can't have been the first to ask this,so I would assume that a better flowing cat must be out there, just gota find it.
__________________
Bored old git that loves his toyota's I have two one a Supra MK3 with a targa top the other is a brit Camry V6. |
11-22-2012, 12:55 AM | #5 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
http://www.randomtechnology.com/toyota.html
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
|
11-23-2012, 10:47 AM | #6 |
Stock
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SCV, CA
Posts: 9
|
Yes, i tried looking for that...
there was some new emission law that came out in 2008? i believe that made it almost completely illegal to get a hi-flow exhaust system. The link provided above has this disclaimer "Note that aftermarket catalytic converters are not legal for use in California on OBD2 vehicles (some 1994 and 1995 and all 1996 and later vehicles)." boooo... i also tried magna flow... and when i looked for california legal hi-flow cats, they listed "replacement" parts... -_- but yes, after receiving the answer above, i went looking for one. meh. will probably need to look harder. that would probably be a "Phase II" of the project if i decide to replace them though. according to the gov website... only CARB approved hi-flow cat systems are legal. that usually means $$$. we'll see i guess. :|
__________________
1997 Supra NA Hopefully soon to be NA-T Last edited by tingboy; 11-23-2012 at 10:59 AM. |
11-23-2012, 01:21 PM | #7 |
Stock
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pontefrac
Posts: 24
|
Cat on a sup
Me I am lucky over here in the UK, as mine is a 87.5 MK3 (one of the first) I don't need a cat they were only made compulsory after 95.
__________________
Bored old git that loves his toyota's I have two one a Supra MK3 with a targa top the other is a brit Camry V6. |
11-23-2012, 03:46 PM | #8 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbo Damage ???? | gottadiesel | MKIII Supra | 8 | 03-16-2009 06:57 AM |
possible BHG how to know if i caused any damage? | 88MKIIISupraNate | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 0 | 11-19-2007 08:44 AM |
Damage air intake hose | 89_supra_ | MKIII Supra | 2 | 12-18-2006 04:02 PM |
water damage help! | haze1321 | MKIII Supra | 2 | 05-18-2005 01:50 PM |