12-27-2005, 04:54 PM | #1 |
Stock
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2
|
Stock Block
I am thinking of getting 97 mkiv, how much power can the stock block hold? Can you get all that power on the stock TT's?
-Evilfurby |
12-27-2005, 09:01 PM | #2 | |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 221
|
Quote:
|
|
12-28-2005, 08:08 PM | #3 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
|
|
12-28-2005, 08:43 PM | #4 | |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 221
|
Quote:
|
|
12-28-2005, 08:58 PM | #5 |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 221
|
Actually let me do the math on this. A 93-98 tt supra puts out about 320hp stock. The stock boost on the ct26's is usually around 7-11.5(ea). Now the ct26's are much like a conventional t3/t4. The ct26 is capable of putting out 20psi max. Now each psi equals about 7-10hp. If we up the boost from the stock 10psi on each turbo to say 20psi on each turbo thats 40 psi total on a 2jz NA puts out around 240. So take 40multiply that by 10 you get 400hp add the stock motors hp which is 240 and you get around 640hp. The proof is in the math. Of course engine management/fuel management will be needed. But the stock turbos are capable of that mark. Now if I can only find that dam link.
I hope all that made sense. Sorry if that was confusing. |
12-29-2005, 06:53 PM | #6 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
If you think you can build an Mkiv Supra TT with a bone-stock 2jz-gte and stock twins that will produce 640hp at the crank (a full 544hp at the wheels) then do so and you will be in the record books. Until then, the theoretical maximum for the oem 2jz-gte twin turbos on a normally aspirated (NA) 2jz-ge is irrelevant to Evilfurby's original question. I might also remind you that the 2jz-ge (NA) has higher compression than the 2jz-gte...and that the head is different so the oem twins don't bolt up to the 2jz-ge head. I hope that wasn't confusing. Last edited by pwpanas; 12-30-2005 at 06:53 PM. |
|
12-29-2005, 07:11 PM | #7 | |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 221
|
Quote:
Btw, I have never heard anyone say "normally aspriated" before. I usually here it as called naturally aspirated. |
|
12-29-2005, 07:17 PM | #8 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
...Also you're the one that brought up horsepower figures for an NA (normally/naturally aspirated) 2jz, which has different pistions in the bottom end than the 2jz-gte that comes with the '97 Mkiv TT. Lastly, I sincerely doubt Evilfuby was talking about buying a '97 Mkiv TT for 20K, and then spending another $15K on headwork (and even with $15K of headwork and cams you STILL won't get 650rwhp out of the stock twins)... LOL! Last edited by pwpanas; 12-29-2005 at 07:22 PM. |
|
12-29-2005, 07:22 PM | #9 | |
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 221
|
Quote:
|
|
12-29-2005, 07:24 PM | #10 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
...oh, and sorry to be the one clue you into the fact that turbo pressure isn't additive. In order to get 40psi out of the stock twins, they'd BOTH have to be pushing 40psi (not 20psi each LOL ). I personally know of only two Mkiv Supra TT owners (one individual and one race team) that literally spent many, many thousands of $ trying to do better than 500rwhp with the stock twins. They both did eventually get there, but even 500rwhp is EXTREMELY difficult to achieve. Even 500rwhp (a VERY, VERY FAR cry from 650rwhp on oem twins) requires EXTENSIVE modifications to BRAND-NEW turbos from Toyota, modified manifolds, throttle body, charge-air system, actuators, wastegate, extrude-honing, P&P, and a BRAND-NEW shortblock from Toyota! In fact, most bpu++++ Mkiv Supras with 50K miles or more on the odo don't ever achieve more than 425rwhp (including me, back when I was 'bpu'). A very few bpu+++ Mkiv Supra TT's do get into the mid and higher 400's, but even that's VERY rare; fwiw, I'd estimate no more than 25 bpu++++ Mkiv Supras ever above 475rwhp (boost only, no NO2) in the US. Like I said, if YOU think that YOU can build a 650rwhp Mkiv Supra TT (stock twins), with a bone-stock 2jz-gte bottom end (even if you do cams, oversize valves or WHATEVER to the 2jz-gte head)...WITHOUT NO2 (and on gasoline not nitromathane ), then I'd encourage you to try. You'd hold the record by a LONG shot, and I'm sure you'd sell that 'would-be-famous' Supra for whatever $ you put into it. Until then, you're doing nothing but spouting absolute nonsense. Really. I do wish you LOTS of luck...because you'll need LOTS of luck, and a heavy dose of magic too, because it's just not possible. Last edited by pwpanas; 12-30-2005 at 03:00 PM. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boost and Stock Fuel | collink | MKIII Supra | 5 | 03-26-2008 11:43 PM |
1986.5 STOCK SWAP TO A SHORT BLOCK | DarkRaiderz | MKIII Supra | 2 | 06-20-2005 11:59 PM |