01-05-2006, 02:30 PM | #21 |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Here's the original Road & Track Test:
http://mkiv.com/publications/road&tr...3/rt393_06.jpg ...fyi there are also more Road & Track articles here: http://mkiv.com/publications/road&track/index.html ...and articles from other publications here: http://www.mkiv.com/publications/index.html
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
01-06-2006, 06:29 AM | #22 |
Intake
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 36
|
oh maybe that 4.9 and 13.4 were from another magazine. when trying to find it, i ran into the car and driver one and it says 4.6 and 13.1... so i guess it depends what day of the week it is. anyways, cool r&t articles
http://www.geocities.com/ma71supratu...93cdsupra.html and here's a site any supra fan would like because it has articles for all mk's http://www.geocities.com/ma71supraturbo/articles.html i like this article too http://www.geocities.com/ma71supratu...93cdsupra.html |
01-06-2006, 06:31 AM | #23 |
Intake
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 36
|
oh, i didn't see all your other links.... we posted like the same thing
|
01-09-2006, 09:43 AM | #24 | |
Stock
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
As like what supragirrl said, the differences are the turbochargers(ct12s), the injectors(440vs550cc), ecu, and the egr system. Japan rated that car at the time as 280ps because of a "gentlemens agreement" to not start horsepower wars. In actuality, both u.s. and jdm supra tt dyno (dyno dynamics) around 270-280rwhp when in good condition in factory form. So basically in stock form they are slightly "identical". When modifying past 400rwhp on the jdm version, they usually swap in the stock export 550cc injectors and ecu. To be a little more specific, the jdm ct12b's are a .42 a/r turbo housing. The major and minor of the ceramic turbine blades are 60mm and 48mm and the compressor side is 62mm and 39mm. For the U.S. ct12b's they use a .53 a/r turbine housing. The major and minor are 52mm and 44mm for the steel turbine blades and 58mm and 39mm for the compressor side. The U.S. spec supra tt is only capable of around 540rwhp on the factory 550cc injectors, and thats at 80+% duty cycle(pretty much maxxed out). The factory U.S. spec turbochargers are only capable of around 490rwhp(give or take a few) as the turbos are out of its efficiency range past that. (there are no known compressor maps for the ct12b's released. But there are similar sized turbos out there (all old style, very similar)with compressor maps that can be used as a rough guide) The sweet spot(and daily driver reliability) for the tt's imho are around 18-20psi(Ive seen 25psi, but it had cams,nitrous and head work made like 500+rwhp), anymore is just heated charge air(got dyno graphs and air temps at diff. psi levels). I have pictures (couple different cases)of overboosted U.S. ct12b's that came apart due to insanely high shaft speeds that it wasnt meant to reach.(20+psi=max boost). Just my fifty cents. |
|
01-09-2006, 01:25 PM | #25 | ||
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.moreboost.org/turbo_detai...stock%20turbos
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. Last edited by pwpanas; 01-09-2006 at 03:09 PM. |
||
01-09-2006, 05:33 PM | #26 | |
Stock
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
Last edited by pwpanas; 08-29-2007 at 12:46 AM. |
|
01-23-2006, 10:58 PM | #27 | |
Stock
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
|
|
01-23-2006, 11:06 PM | #28 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
|
08-29-2007, 12:24 AM | #29 |
Stock
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 3
|
Sorry to revive an old thread guys but searching gave me this as a best choice.
Im living in canada and have purchased a supra in Japan, just waiting until may 08 to import it. Im not worried about the car itself but just a general question. as its well known the JDM supra because of japanese laws and the hp limits car manufactureres agreed to they are limited to 280hp from the factory and the North American ones are 320, is there anyway to increase the HP to North American standards without doing BPU or upgrading expensive parts? Basically what I'm asking, is the restriction to 280HP to do with sofware of the ECU or is it hardware related which means I would have to replace the turbo's with steel ones as well as increase injector size along with other mods? |
08-29-2007, 12:48 AM | #30 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
new toyota supra 2007 | admin | The Future of the Toyota Supra | 216 | 12-28-2011 10:22 AM |
1983 supra engine question | 101jinx101 | MKII Supra | 0 | 12-06-2007 10:47 AM |