Home / Toyota Supra Forums

Go Back   Toyota Supra Forums! Join the Supra forum! > Performance, Modification, and Maintenance Forums - for generation specific discussions > MKIV Supra

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-05-2006, 01:05 PM   #1
Benesesso
3" Exhaust
 
Benesesso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 145
Benesesso is on a distinguished road
Default Head Gasket Differences

What did Toyota do to reduce/eliminate the BHG problem that the 87-91 Turbo Supras have? Did they just increase the bolt torque or did they add more bolts?
__________________
"You see, wire telegraph is like a very long cat. You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. Do you understand this? Radio operates the same way: You send signals here, they receive them there. The only difference is there is no cat." A. Einstein

1988 and 1990 Turbo Supras
Benesesso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2006, 10:39 PM   #2
TONY!
12psi boost
 
TONY!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Troy, NY 12180
Posts: 353
TONY! is on a distinguished road
Default

According to this site, the MKIV and 1JZ motors came with metal head gaskets.
http://www.jza70.com/articles/engine...omp_chart.html

That would be one factor.
The common head gasket failures with the MKIII's are due to lack of torque from the factory.
They really should have recalled them!
It does not take that long to tighten up the headbolts, but instead many MKIII's seen the junkyard instead of what could have happened....


EDIT: by the way, is there a reason why you posted this in the MKIV section?
Were you trying to get the feedback from the MKIV'ers and their take on all this?
__________________
-------------> ITEMS THAT ARE STILL AVAILABLE FROM AN '88 PART OUT <-------------

_____|_____
/. . . \ . . . \ . .\
( ]/ . . . . \ . . . \ . .\[ )
_________________
/OO]====(W)====[OO\
[___________________]
[ [O] ///______\\\ [O]_]
____________________[||]______________[||]____________________
TONY! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2006, 11:36 PM   #3
Benesesso
3" Exhaust
 
Benesesso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 145
Benesesso is on a distinguished road
Default

I've done a bunch of searching and couldn't find any good answers. The 1990 Supra I recently bought only had 65k miles, and it ran fine for several months. The previous owner said he had retorqued the head bolts ~40k miles, and I believe him. At ~72k miles the HG started leaking slightly into cyl. 6 and a tiny bit into #2. Pulled the head off right away-no heat damage. The head bolts were right ~70 ft. lb.


So, I think I had a case of some previous HG damage from the orig. low torque, but retorquing did not prevent the BHG.

Since it appears that the Mark IV's don't usually have the problem, I just wondered what Toyota did differently. Looks like they kept the same 14 bolts but raised the torque--and maybe used a better HG.
__________________
"You see, wire telegraph is like a very long cat. You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. Do you understand this? Radio operates the same way: You send signals here, they receive them there. The only difference is there is no cat." A. Einstein

1988 and 1990 Turbo Supras
Benesesso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2006, 01:29 AM   #4
TONY!
12psi boost
 
TONY!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Troy, NY 12180
Posts: 353
TONY! is on a distinguished road
Default

Well having a higher torque upon original installation and torquing the head gasket down after many many years is not exactly the same thing.

I would think that the MKIV's have better head gasket sealing due to the MHG and I would think that toyota placed it in between a flat and smooth head and block (what some individuals don't do when using MHG's).

It is said that detonation is one of the biggest reasons for head gasket failures also.

I think the winning formula to for the ultimate sealing would be to get the block and head milled to a low RA (roughness average) of 40 or less and then use Permatex Brake Quiet in the can form and spray that onto the metal gasket, then install the gasket and the head and tighten it to 85-90 foot pounds of torque.

To be honest with you, the reason why so many have bad luck is because they don't do things the right way and take short cuts.
That applies to many other jobs and not just the BHG repairs.
__________________
-------------> ITEMS THAT ARE STILL AVAILABLE FROM AN '88 PART OUT <-------------

_____|_____
/. . . \ . . . \ . .\
( ]/ . . . . \ . . . \ . .\[ )
_________________
/OO]====(W)====[OO\
[___________________]
[ [O] ///______\\\ [O]_]
____________________[||]______________[||]____________________
TONY! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2006, 12:41 PM   #5
pwpanas
Supra Owner
 
pwpanas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
pwpanas is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TONY!
Well having a higher torque upon original installation and torquing the head gasket down after many many years is not exactly the same thing.

I would think that the MKIV's have better head gasket sealing due to the MHG and I would think that toyota placed it in between a flat and smooth head and block (what some individuals don't do when using MHG's).

It is said that detonation is one of the biggest reasons for head gasket failures also.

I think the winning formula to for the ultimate sealing would be to get the block and head milled to a low RA (roughness average) of 40 or less and then use Permatex Brake Quiet in the can form and spray that onto the metal gasket, then install the gasket and the head and tighten it to 85-90 foot pounds of torque.

To be honest with you, the reason why so many have bad luck is because they don't do things the right way and take short cuts.
That applies to many other jobs and not just the BHG repairs.
Good post/info, Tony!

Another piece of (related) info is that the oem head bolts don't hold past about 37psi of boost. Oem-sized ARP's do a little better than that, but many Mkiv Supras running over 40psi of boost have gone to 1/2" ARP studs.

Btw, I'm curious: what does the Permatex Brake Quiet do? Fwiw, I'm aware of a number of 1000hp+ 2jz-gte's built without it, using the oem headgasket, with no headgasket leaks/failures. Will an organic compound like that stand up to 1000hp+ combustion forces? Also, will it make the head more difficult to remove later?
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+
Displacement is no replacement for boost.
Life begins at 30psi.


NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners.

Last edited by pwpanas; 04-07-2006 at 12:43 PM.
pwpanas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2006, 01:38 AM   #6
TONY!
12psi boost
 
TONY!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Troy, NY 12180
Posts: 353
TONY! is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pwpanas
Good post/info, Tony!...
Thanks you, sir. I try.
Quote:
...but many Mkiv Supras running over 40psi of boost have gone to 1/2" ARP studs...
Yep, I have heard that. That is something that is a trend amongst the MKIV guys...I just don't hear of many MKIIIers doing that (except for one...maybe others keep it as a "secret"...).
Quote:
...Btw, I'm curious: what does the Permatex Brake Quiet do? ...
Well it helps seal up the gasket. See, many don't get their block milled to a low enough RA to use a MHG as suggested from the MHG manufacturers. It sort of fills in and helps with that situation (but can only do it to a degree).

This one guy that has a 1000 HP 7M started using it, and others have tried it too with good results. At first I was sort of unsure of what to think of it since it is was relatively new thing, but so far, nothing but good results have come of it as more and more people are using it.
Seems to be the most sure way of getting the gasket to seal up right--has the highest success rating.
Quote:
...Also, will it make the head more difficult to remove later?
I don't think so...not as far as I know or have ever read or heard of.

Glad we got to discuss this with you, Phil.
Had I moved this thread to the MKIII section (where the BHG area is heheh), we would not have traded posts.
TONY! is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Blown Head Gasket Snake Oil unkymurch Non-Generation Specific Questions 21 08-06-2010 02:11 AM
1989 Supra blown head gasket rayk5799 Non-Generation Specific Questions 6 05-18-2009 10:51 AM
hks head gasket suprabahamut MKIII Supra 8 09-01-2007 04:28 AM
Head Gasket replacement questions. DavidLeClair584 MKIII Supra 1 06-09-2007 09:17 PM
Buying a 87, head gasket questions Gengus MKIII Supra 1 04-14-2007 07:15 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

1986



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87