05-29-2006, 06:05 PM | #1 |
Stock
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 19
|
wisp of smoke under boost?
Hi all,
I have a little problem. I recently put a T72 ball bearing on my 94 Supra. (I already had a T61 single with all the goodies and it ran awesome, just wanted to upgrade, seeing as I had the turbo off to fix some exhaust leaks). It runs fine, although I had to turn the boost down from 18psi to about 14psi or so to keep it from running too lean. Problem is this: When it starts to build boost or when I let off from boosting, there is a puff of white smoke coming thru my vented hood. Can't tell where it is coming from (haven't had the time to get it on the dyno), althought it is coming from the passenger side, so I think it is obviously turbo or intake related. It didn't do this with the T61. Should the hose from the valve cover be going to the intake side of the turbo to act as a type of PCV, or just to a catch can? It doesn't smoke at any other time. Only under boost and after boosting for a quick second. I know its not serious, but everytime I see it, I instinctively let off, sucks to drive that way. Thanks in advance for your help. |
05-30-2006, 05:28 AM | #2 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
2) How much boost are you running on pump gas? 3) Have you tested your compresson? If not, I'd suggest you do...and please let us know what the specific per-cylinder results are. 4) Possibly a dumb suggestion, but if you could take a short drive with your hood off, perhaps you could see the source of the smoke under boost and letting off? The hose from the valve cover should be going to the input of a catch-can, and then the output of the catch-can shoudl be going to the intake side of the turbo.
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. Last edited by pwpanas; 05-30-2006 at 05:30 AM. |
|
05-30-2006, 11:29 PM | #3 |
Stock
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 19
|
I am very experienced in turbos. Aside from owning a ton of other turbo vehicles, I also have a twin turbo 69 Camaro that I built from the ground up, and I dragrace a GSX-R1000 that is turbo charged.
I only tell you this so you don't think you're wasting your time or dealing with an idiot or worse someone who THINKS they know what they're talking about, or bought a car that is way above their knowledge and experience. I appreciate your help as it takes time and thought to put words to page. Soooo... I have a stock fuel system except for the 255lph pump. As I said in my post, right now I am running 14psi with the t72. I was running 18 with the t61. both on pump gas with no issues. (plugs (iridiums) look great) I have not tested my compression, but I am confident that my engine is sound. It ran perfect with the t61. It has a good tuneup in it and its a low mileage engine (65k). It doesn't blow any smoke on startup or while running, just the quick wisp on boost. I'm going to try to get on the dyno this weekend to see whats going on, but I'm not confident as my tuner is flatout and dyno time is at a premium. It should do this sitting still as well as moving down the road. I do NOT have a catch can, although I am finding out that this is a must. The hose goes straight from the valve cover to the intake side of the turbo between the mass air and the inlet of the turbo. I SUSPECT this is my problem. I think the greater volume of air from the bigger turbo is creating this mystery wisp, just can't see from where. Is it possible that my blowoff valve is no longer big enough to compensate for this extra air and this wisp of smoke is the excess boost coming back through my turbo, which we all know is bad, and because I don't have a catch can, I see a little oil wisp? It seems I can't be the only one to have this problem, thats what brought me here... again, I appreciate your 2 cents... |
05-31-2006, 01:02 PM | #4 | ||||||
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. Last edited by pwpanas; 05-31-2006 at 01:13 PM. |
||||||
06-01-2006, 02:26 AM | #5 |
Stock
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 19
|
I did check all the plugs recently (about a week ago) when I replaced them and they were clean, no piston. I suppose that is in part to my decrease in boost. As I said I was only running 14psi or so and I have a ProFec E-01 boost controller, which I was under the impression that these electronic controllers controlled boost creep. (Is that true in your opinion?) I have a HKS EVC IV on my 69 Camaro and it works mint.
I actually have a set of 720cc injectors and a HKS fuel rail, I just wasn't going to put them on until I installed an AEM ECU. When I installed the T72, I re-dynoed the car to make sure there were no changes. As it happened, it was quite a bit leaner with the increased volume, so based on my A/F ratio, I ended up at 14 psi or so and it seems safe. Is it possible that the A/F is safe (around 11.0-11.5?) yet still run lean and/or detonate? I thought (from reading many of these posts) that a stock Supra fuel system can support UP TO 500hp or so. My car was only around 460ish rwhp with the T61, and as I recall, right around 430-440 now with less boost, even though more turbo. What do you think? It sounds like I need to do a comp test anyway just to insure there is no damage. I have a little piece of mind after seeing my plugs, but your right, proof is on the pressure gauge. I know this info is here somewhere but what should I see for cylinder pressure, and the minimum delta from cyl to cyl? Might take a little time to check it, but I will do it. I am leaning also towards some kind of stupid oil leak. I think dyno is the best and easiest and safest way to find this out. Look forward to your reply. Thanks again for your input. gotta go to bed, 4:30 comes quick... Mike |
06-06-2006, 12:38 AM | #6 | ||||||||||
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.mkiv.com/manual/manualtt/...eck/index.html Quote:
P.S. Sorry for the delayed response. My computer was down due to a change in residence (i.e. moving).
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
||||||||||
06-10-2006, 07:31 PM | #7 |
Stock
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 19
|
Hi
Thanks for the response. Guess what I just finished doing? Yep, comp check. As I suspected, I think I'm good. Cyl 1= 160 cyl 2=156 cyl 3=157 cyl 4=155 cyl 5=160 cyl 6=155 It looks practically impossible to drive the car and try to see the engine compartment. I am trying like hell to get on the dyno. I'm gonna leave the boost at 14-15 for now and wait until I can find this problem, I'm sure now it's something stupid. It's not actually leaking, it's letting out a wisp of smoke under boost and when I let off from boost. Absolutely nothing leaking on the floor at all. Anyway, does anyone know how to convert to MAP? I'm thinking I'm gonna bite the bullet and buy the AEM ECU. I don't wanna deal with the mass air anymore. I've heard it's a simple wire crossover at the mass air connector and change the parameter in the AEM. Thanks again... Mike |
06-11-2006, 02:04 AM | #8 | ||||
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
||||
06-11-2006, 12:13 PM | #9 |
Stock
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 19
|
I found a guy (experienced tuner!) who has tuned a lot of AEM Boxes AND MR-2's + Supras and it shouldn't be a problem. For now I'm going to start collecting parts for my fuel upgrade and probably order the AEM. As soon as I find my wispy smoke problem, I'll post.
Thanks again for your time Mike |
06-11-2006, 06:05 PM | #10 | |
Supra Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
Again, good luck with finding the wisp of smoke (I hope it's something easy to correct), and with your planned upgrades.
__________________
Phil '94 Supra Turbo, 6spd, 'APU'+ Displacement is no replacement for boost. Life begins at 30psi. NB: Please consider posting any help requests in a new thread instead of asking me for help privately. About 99.9+% of the time, private help requests end up covering great information that could be very valuable to other forum members. If you have a good reason for needing the help request to be private, I'll consider it. If not, then why not give everyone else the opportunity to pitch in too, and/or learn from the information? Remember, there's no such thing as a dumb question. We're all here to help within this family of Supra owners. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
low boost psi, wtf | supradad86_5 | MKIII Supra | 4 | 02-09-2014 02:05 AM |
wont hold boost | Supraman | MKIII Supra | 12 | 04-19-2007 04:52 AM |
issue w/ boost spikes? i think? | NOTORIOUS VR | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 17 | 01-17-2007 08:35 PM |
installing manual boost controller 1989?? | hamburgler | MKIII Supra | 4 | 07-13-2005 12:55 PM |
No boost in neutral but boost in gear! | edgardo | MKIII Supra | 5 | 10-09-2004 04:01 AM |