07-03-2005, 02:14 AM | #1 |
Stock
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5
|
I know I'm asking a lot of questions, but I'd rather know before getting a car that won't last a month. Is the non-turbo more dependable? What are the pros and cons of the two versions? Does the 32 hp the turbo version adds make much difference? (Like actual acceleration numbers)
__________________
Aboyandhiscar |
07-03-2005, 07:05 PM | #2 |
SP58GT
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Antonio texas
Posts: 646
|
it depends on how you drive. i'm more likely to respect the turbo version due to its power. keep in mind you can only use premium fuel and keep up with maintenance. the non turbo can get more neglected abuse, but why buy that car for that reason.
__________________
....all you need is a small taste of success and you will find it suits you.... monique- better off dead |
07-04-2005, 08:02 PM | #3 |
12psi boost
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West Milford, NJ
Posts: 357
|
I agree with Monki, if your worried about dependability, go get yourself a toyota camry to drive as your everyday driver, and the get the supra and just hit the gas and have a blast. Me i prefer the N/A, was never much into turbos, but things change who knows.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HELP PLEASE | Nick0887 | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 4 | 02-28-2009 07:26 AM |
Dream Offer | Karma_Supra | MKIV Supra | 22 | 10-17-2007 03:04 PM |
Sequential Turbo Question | suprapoweredsoarer | MKIV Supra | 1 | 06-06-2006 12:13 AM |