![]() |
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Oh I just took a look at the first reply and if I may suggest: don't listen to him! Well, he's got some truth but saying that going from N/A to turbo is no more work than changing your stock turbos is NOT TRUE.
The non-turbo supra engine is not at all like the turbo one so if you want to convert it to a turbo one you have to change MANY things. Keep in mind that the N/A is set to use air at the atmospheric pressure. If you cram in compressed air from a turbo, you have to change a lot of parts to get the right compression ratio for an example. And that's only one of the many things. I've already seen such a thing (N/A to turbo) but it's even more expensive than buying a turbo supra engine in the first place. If you chose to get a supra, get the turbo one. The supra is well know for it's remarkably strong engine that can handle 800+hp on STOCK internals. Also keep in mind that it's only a 3.0L engine so without forced induction (turbo) you can't except to get THAT much power. Turbo all the way. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HELP PLEASE | Nick0887 | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 4 | 02-28-2009 07:26 AM |
Dream Offer | Karma_Supra | MKIV Supra | 22 | 10-17-2007 03:04 PM |
Buying tips for a early '90's Twin Turbo | modelseasii | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 0 | 04-18-2007 03:58 PM |
Sequential Turbo Question | suprapoweredsoarer | MKIV Supra | 1 | 06-06-2006 12:13 AM |
1g-gteu twin turbo to 2jz twin turbo engine swap | landspeedxxx | MKIII Supra | 7 | 03-30-2006 07:09 PM |