|
![]() |
#3 |
Stock
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 1
![]() |
![]()
o_0 at previous reply!
Lets first get all the specs: 1990 Supra turbo: Horsepower: 232 hp @ 5600 rpm Torque: 254 ft-lbs. @ 3200 rpm 2002 Wrx turbo: Horsepower: 227 @ 6000 RPM Torque: 217 ft-lbs. @ 4000 RPM 2001 Mustang Gt: 3.8L 190 hp V6 Horsepower 190 @ 5250 RPM Torque (lb-ft) 220 @ 2750 RPM or 4.6L 260 hp V8 Horsepower 260 @ 5250 RPM Torque (lb-ft) 302 @ 4000 RPM So as we can see, the supra, if running optimally, should take on the wrx as it has more torque kickin' in at a lower rpm and a little extra hp also at kickin in at a lower hp, it should also have no trouble with the mustang if it's a v6, if it's the v8 then no. Also, since when is AWD better for acceleration then rwd lol???? Maybe for offroad use or when there is low traction like snow or rain or gravel, then ok, but for street use and racing in dry conditions, RWD all the way!!! RWD is always superrior for acceleration, that is why many sports cars and indy cars, F1 cars etc... are all RWD. Lets not forget the turbo supra's rear differential is a LSD differential on all turbos. Also, awd is heavier and loses more energy transferred to the wheels as opposed to a RWD |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1990 Supra Turbo -Any Good!!? | ukferrari | MKIII Supra | 3 | 12-13-2009 09:13 PM |
HELP PLEASE | Nick0887 | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 4 | 02-28-2009 07:26 AM |
Dream Offer | Karma_Supra | MKIV Supra | 22 | 10-17-2007 03:04 PM |
Supra 1986.5(non turbo) VS Mustang 1996 | Supra GuestBarbotte | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 4 | 03-19-2005 03:35 PM |