|
|
12-01-2005, 06:49 PM
|
#1 |
|
Intake
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 48
 |
How much does a 1998 N/A supra put out?
|
|
|
|
12-01-2005, 08:28 PM
|
#2 |
|
SP58GT
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Dirty Jerz
Posts: 691
|
225hp is the answer
__________________
Now: Saving for an MKIV Broken Rides: (Sold) 91 supra turbo 5speed with a 1jzgte motor 421whp 400(399) ft*lbs of torque on tap @ 15 psi "Always outnumbered, never outgunned." |
|
|
|
|
12-01-2005, 08:44 PM
|
#3 |
|
Lexus & 550's
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In the shadows
Posts: 506
|
sorry my bad, i didnt realize i was in the mk4 section when i posted, but it still applies sorta..
|
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005, 06:14 AM
|
#4 |
|
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lubbock Texas
Posts: 140
|
found this, read torque, and weight. don't they play role in numbers?
http://www.geocities.com/ma71supraturbo/ |
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005, 04:31 PM
|
#5 |
|
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 77
|
Ive driven both cars.Im driving my second Supra and my ex-girlfriend had a M3,daddy's little girl til he found out what I was doing to his baby.Anyway,it's obvious about the comparison of the two.The technology plays a big big role in this whole horsepower issue.But dont let the paper stats fool you.Ive seen people outrun cars with more horsepower than them.It depends on the driver and your preference.Id take my Supra over an M3 anyday and im sure most of the people here would too.
__________________
RedSupra''87'' |
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005, 06:53 PM
|
#6 |
|
SP58GT
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Dirty Jerz
Posts: 691
|
well of course...i mean this is the supra forum right? or no...?
__________________
Now: Saving for an MKIV Broken Rides: (Sold) 91 supra turbo 5speed with a 1jzgte motor 421whp 400(399) ft*lbs of torque on tap @ 15 psi "Always outnumbered, never outgunned." |
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005, 07:12 PM
|
#7 |
|
Intake
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 48
|
Well im not asking about personal pref but still 1998 m3 puts out 280 and a 1998 supra puts out like 245, so im not seeing why or how you guys can say that you would take a supra over a m3, you guys are saying id rather have my supra anyday, ofcourse you would it has mods, stock to stock what would you want? im not a m3 fan, i love supras but my friend is saying that a supra is faster stock to stock na to na
|
|
|
|
|
12-04-2005, 05:48 AM
|
#8 |
|
Intake
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 36
|
an m3 will beat a na stock. but you could buy two of those for under the price of the m3. i would compare the tt to the m3 for closer pricing and 1/4 mile times. 0-60 of an m3 SMG 03(list 47k) is like 5.0 and the 93 supra tt is 4.9 and that car is 12 years old. 1/4 m3 is 13.5 and the supra 13.4 stock
N/A is 6.9/15.2 |
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005, 08:10 PM
|
#9 | |
|
3" Exhaust
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lubbock Texas
Posts: 140
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-23-2006, 03:33 AM
|
#10 |
|
Stock
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12
|
2 diffrent classes of cars. this cannot be argued.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Begginer to SUPRA and cars, I GOT A FREE SUPRA, PLEASE HELP!! | 89MkiiiSupra | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 5 | 06-01-2010 06:48 AM |
| Kill Board! | Isphius | Show n Tell | 95 | 01-25-2010 05:05 AM |
| Questions about MKIV Supra | ukno0003 | MKIV Supra | 5 | 11-06-2008 10:53 AM |
| Dream Offer | Karma_Supra | MKIV Supra | 22 | 10-17-2007 03:04 PM |
| new here and thinking about getting a Supra | WhisPer | MKIV FAQ | 20 | 03-17-2007 01:35 PM |
Hybrid Mode
