Quote:
|
Originally Posted by scruffboy
Hi Folks,
I have joined Supramania and have been reading their posts. Over there, they act like if you don't have a turbo, you don't really have a Supra. My '89 is NA and seems plenty fast. I've gotten it up to 140 mph on the highway. Plus, the engine compartment is cramped with enough stuff as it is. I've seen turbos and I would hate to work around all that plumbing. I've never driven a turbo. Is there that much of a difference? In 1989 Motor Trend did a "Top Ten Shootout" of the fastest cars for that year, and they got the Turbo Supra up to 146 mph max. I've come pretty close to that in my NA. Is the difference in the lower ratio's? Anyway, I'm very happy with my car and I love these boards so I think I'll stick around here, If you all don't mind. It seems a lot less snooty here at home.
Sincerely,
Scruffboy
|
You kno they just added a 7M GE section right? I've been there since Jan. Everyone there has a really good sense of humor and can answer a lot of things. Except there is one really heated thread in off topic right now that I've been trying to lighten up. It worked so far until the other 2 that are fighting start posting again. If you want to feel like you dont even have a supra, go to supraforums.com. It's like, if you have a MKIII then you dont have a supra and be prepared for the worst flaming and sodomization of your life.