10-12-2007, 04:01 PM | #51 |
Intake
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: OK of US of A
Posts: 48
|
good info to know
__________________
GOVERMENT APPROVED HIGH SPEED VEHICLE
|
11-29-2007, 06:27 PM | #52 | |
Stock
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Jersey
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
Therefore in most cases it won't affect the ballance if you use a lighter flywheel assuming it is prebalanced. It will change the critical frequency of the assembly though but most engines never hit their critical frequency anyway. Besides the decrease in overall weight a lighter flywheel will make the engine spool up much faster. Faster engine spool = more hp. Does anyone know the weight of a stock flywheel? |
|
01-05-2008, 04:28 AM | #53 |
Intake
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lancaster PA
Posts: 45
|
Engineering
I'll admit that in previous cars i've eliminated weight to try to augment the overall performance. The weight I eliminated usually came with drawbacks, like having to shift while using both hands to pray i dont get a flat (because the spare and hardware was removed), or hoping that i dont pick up more than one girl at a time (because the rear doors were gutted and rear seats removed, and A/C system eliminated).
I'll say this for the supra, if you want to increase performance, horsepower is not hard to come by. Maybe you want to augment the motor, trans, or rear end? Perhaps just a high flow air filter? A high flow (legal) cat and less restrictive exhaust all together would help the base motor run better and stronger. After your pedigree restrictions in intake and exhaust have been aleviated, you're ready to tune. Find a stand-alone engine management system and work out any factory fuel curve kinks you may have. Before you go replacing hard parts on ANY car to try to get more out of it, start putting quality fuels and lubricants in it. Just like your body, you need to treat your car well. Eat healthy foods, feel better. Run quality fuels, get better milage and performance. Avoid fuels spiked with ethanol, as alcohol yields far less BTU's than gasoline, and as it damages fuel systems not designed to run alcohols. Use a synthetic motor oil, or at least a branded petroleum quality oil. In short, you get out what you put in. |
05-02-2008, 07:45 AM | #54 |
Stock
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: fullerton
Posts: 10
|
"get the underdrive pulley for the crank (it's lighter than stock too), ect..."
Plz explain what you mean... thanx
__________________
*86.5 N/A *Fully Rebuilt Engine *Port Polished Head *Painted Wheels MODS TO DO NEXT: (in order) -Eibach Lowering Springs -Tokico Struts -Sway Bars -Headers -3 in. Piping -Cold Air Intake -Wheels |
05-13-2008, 09:43 AM | #55 |
Stock
Join Date: May 2008
Location: seattle washington, US
Posts: 4
|
balance
Don't forget the near even balance front/back of the supra either. The ratios are great because of the weight on the steer tires and the traction tires.
A wider stance and endless power options for this wonder car make weight a minor issue. But the seating could be lightened and allow for minor weight lessoning while maintaining balance... |
10-13-2008, 05:38 AM | #56 |
Stock
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: CO
Posts: 1
|
what???
The MK3 supra has McPherson struts in all four corners. and on the topic of sub frame connectors, you really have nothing to connect them to. if you want to eliminate flex then you need larger sway bars, a 6 point cage, and ACTUAL strut braces. That cheap crap you see in magazines and movies does nothing. Actual strut braces must be triangulated and have gussets placed on the bends for structural support. welding seams works as well and realistically for any other cars that you do put sub frame connectors on, remember one thing, bolt on sub frame connectors are absolutely useless. all the tension is applied to the bolts. If you want to modify a chassis the only way to go is welding and fabrication.
|
11-14-2008, 09:08 AM | #57 |
Stock
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1
|
I've removed quite alot of weight from my supra (even my rear window screen wiper and motor) i'm hoping it will pass a WOf without it.. Also removed sound deadener rear seats and carpet. Removed plastic from inside roof tyre and rear panels. have yet to see how much it has changed the handling or performance of my car as it is in the shop getting a turbo rebuild. 'm wanting someone to do a 1/4 mile time before and after weight reduction to see how much performance is actually gained from doing this.. i've been told by my girlfriend and everyone elce that it will do nothing but i want to prove they are wrong for once so please anyone out there who has gained an increese in acceleration and handeling from weight reduction with time slips please show
__________________
1989 MKlll Toyota Supra 7M - GTE |
11-30-2008, 01:02 AM | #58 |
Stock
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Olympia, Washington
Posts: 3
|
"The MK3 supra has McPherson struts in all four corners."
Are you positive on this? You might want to take a closer look. My MK3 (86) has dual 'A' arms with coil over shocks up front and dual link lowers with 'A' arm on top and coil over shock in rear.
__________________
'86 Supra '84 Sr5 Last edited by wa-mkIII; 11-30-2008 at 10:08 PM. Reason: correction |
06-26-2009, 08:39 AM | #59 | |
Intake
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
No that sounds about right, I was talkin to this machinist today about it and said about the same thing. And I trust his words cus he worked on F1 engines and stuff for years |
|
11-23-2009, 10:05 AM | #60 |
Intake
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 36
|
Chromo???
well if you are going to use 4130 chromo which i assume is what you mean your gunna be spending somewhat on the lines of 1500 bucks just on tube alone no labor, not to mention your gunna need to get it heat treated. How many places are going to have an oven and an oil bath large enough for that, that is somewhat affordable (none) and the only way your going to get any benifit from 4130 chomo is if you get ti heat treated and normalized. If you want a tube chassis you should use plain old 1026 DOM.
And realistically i wouldn't even cut the weight out of the car. i used to have a mk2 that had a couple of car fires and there was litterally no interior at all, because it was all burnt out. and all it really did for me was killed the ability for the car to make a turn with out loosing traction in the back. so unless you can cut out the weight in an even distribution i really wouldn't recommend it. but hey if anyone does let me know I always wanted to know how fast it would be in a strait line after cutting tons of weight. haha |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for a thread? | GTE89 | MKIII Supra | 1 | 12-11-2006 04:34 AM |
it's official | skunk | MKIII Supra | 4 | 12-02-2005 04:10 AM |
how do u display ur mods on ur thread?? | blitzmkiii | Non-Generation Specific Questions | 2 | 10-06-2005 11:59 AM |